Articless

Someone listening?

                                                                                                      --- Ankit Jha

The political dilemma! Again puppets are crying. As the race for the India’s no 1 has been completed but results are yet awaited. As that is being awaited, I would like to acquire you all to the 1 week  past .salman  khurshid , hon’ble cabinet minister for law & order ,inan encounter with the national news paper questioned on the role of royal prince & chief secretary congress rahul Gandhi in the active politics . he hinted for the active participation for him in national politics & also the party is going directionless. This truth reformed to a pungent pinch in the congress parts of body. Almost whole of congress society criticized the statement & asked khurshid to clarify his states the opposition took it as the sweetest dessert of the year & washed their hands in flowing river. The very next day Mr. khurshid , one of the soft speaking political leader of India analyzed the role of media & proved it a wrong way of journalism ,Blaming media for the misinterpretation of his words. He clarified that his party is neither Directionless nor the P.M.is underachiever

                                                                                        It was Khurshid’s chapter & there were many questions arose from here, in the same way like rises from ‘Trigonometry’ of mathematics. Someone needed to answer it all, then there’s come Most speaking Political Brat of India, also the acting guardian of Rahul Gandhi, Digvijay Singh,, who answered with an optimism of introducing Rahul to the active & influenced politics with many reforms. He assured everyone saying that after the Presidential election, Rahul shall be launched again some added features & responsibilities. It was well signed by the HOD of puppets & chairperson of UPA, also mother of Rahul in a public conference.                                                                                                                                                                                                       Now the whole of expert society is busy in the analysis of the statement. What would be the apt role for Baba? The million dollar question… “Acting chief of Party, Minister in the central cabinet or Prime Minister? What would be Rahul’s new & so called active & influenced role? As per me he should be a responsibility which could allow him to visit the doorsteps of the Indian beings. This is the role that suits him most, to his deep roots. Neither a P.M., a party chief nor a cabinet minister can do it, so what role would he be rewarded with for his outstanding performance in UP & Bihar legislative elections. Wasn’t that outstanding, where he stood outside only after the thrashening of his party & his personality was sprawled. He stood nicely out of the defeats in Goa, Punjab & Mumbai. It is proved that when he achieves something it looks like a Prodigy & also the Bright future of Young India but when he faces a setback it’s not counted as his fault. It means he owns both ‘Head’ & ‘Tail’ of his performance. So he should be made an NSSO worker or something like that where is performance is not questionable & always applauded. Rajesh Khanna hated Tears & Rahul hates Allegations Pushpa!!!!.

                                                                Someone’s listening or not? Rahul is back again… the time good spoken & almost silent leader is all set to be floored on Congress stage. Huge round of Applause to Rahul Gandhi, as he is coming out atleast.

Know about it-

The Right To Information Act 2005

The Right to Information Act 2005 (RTI) is an Act of the Parliament of India "to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens." The Act applies to all States and Union Territories of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Jammu and Kashmir has its own act called Jammu & Kashmir Right to Information Act, 2009. Under the provisions of the Act, any citizen may request information from a "public authority" (a body of Government or "instrumentality of State") which is required to reply expeditiously or within thirty days. The Act also requires every public authority to computerize their records for wide dissemination and to pro-actively publish certain categories of information so that the citizens need minimum recourse to request for information formally. This law was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005 and came fully into force on 12 October 2005. Information disclosure in India was hitherto restricted by the Official Secrets Act 1923 and various other special laws, which the new RTI Act now relaxes.

Disclosure of State information in British India was (and is) governed from 1889 by the Official Secrets Act. This law secures information related to security of the State, sovereignty of the country and friendly relations with foreign states, and contains provisions which prohibit disclosure of non-classified information. Civil Service conduct rules and the Indian Evidence Act impose further restrictions on government officials' powers to disclose information to the public.

Freedom of Information Act 2002-

Passage of a national level law, however, proved to be a difficult task. Given the experience of state governments in passing practicable legislation, the Central Government appointed a working group under H. D. Shourie and assigned it the task of drafting legislation. The Shourie draft, in an extremely diluted form, was the basis for the Freedom of Information Bill, 2000 which eventually became law under the Freedom of Information Act, 2002. In late 2002 the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) asked for scrutiny of the proposed bill by the Supreme Court to determine whether the bill gave citizens sufficient power to find out about governance. The government had been reluctant to recognize that the people had a right to know, and after the CPIL filing it rushed through the bill without correcting known defects. This Act was severely criticized for permitting too many exemptions, not only under the standard grounds of national security and sovereignty, but also for requests that would involve "disproportionate diversion of the resources of a public authority". There was no upper limit on the charges that could be levied. There were no penalties for not complying with a request for information. This Act, consequently, never came into effective force.

State Level Laws

The RTI Laws were first successfully enacted by the state governments of — Karnataka (2000), Goa (1997), Rajasthan (2000), Tamil Nadu (1997), Delhi (2001), Maharashtra (2002), Assam (2002), Madhya Pradesh (2003), and Jammu and Kashmir (2004). The Maharashtra and Delhi State level enactments are considered to have been the most widely used. The Delhi RTI Act is still in force. Jammu & Kashmir, has its own Right to Information Act of 2009, the successor to the repealed J&K Right to Information Act, 2004 and its 2008 amendments

Right to Information movement

In early 1990s Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathana began a movement to− bring in transparency in village accounts. Initially, MKSS lobbied government to obtain information such as master rolls (employment and payment records) and bills and vouchers relating to purchase and transportation of materials. This information was then crosschecked at Jan Sunwais (public hearings) against actual testimonies of workers. The public hearings were incredibly successful in drawing attention to corruption and exposing leakages in the system. Success of MKSS became a source of inspiration for activists in India and led to the genesis of a broader discourse on the right to information in India. In 1993, a first draft RTI law was proposed by the Consumer Education and Research Council, Ahmedabad (CERC). In 1996, the Press Council of India headed by Justice P B Sawant presented a draft model law on the right to information to the Government of India. The draft model law was later updated and renamed the PCI-NIRD Freedom of Information Bill 1997. MKSS's advocacy gave rise to the National Campaign on People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which was formed to advocate for the right to information at the national level. In 1997 efforts to legislate for the right to information, at both the State and National level, quickened. A working group under the chairmanship of Mr. H D Shourie (the Shourie Committee) was set up by the Central Government and given the mandate to prepare draft legislation on freedom of information. The Shourie Committee's Report and draft law were published in 1997. The Shourie Committee draft law was passed through two successive governments, but was never introduced in Parliament. In 1999 NDA minister Mr Ram Jethmalani, then Union Minister for Urban Development, issued an administrative order enabling citizens to inspect and receive photocopies of files. Shourie Committee draft law was reworked into the Freedom of Information Bill 2000. It was passed in December 2002 and received Presidential asset on January 2003, as the Freedom of Information Act 2002. In 1998, during the Rajasthan State elections the Congress Party promised in its election manifesto to enact a law on right to information if it came to power. Following their election, the Party appointed a committee of bureaucrats to draft a bill on the right to information. As the Committee was comprised only bureaucrats, strong objections were raised by civil society organisations, following which the members of MKSS and National Campaign for People Right to Information were invited to assist in drafting the bill. MKSS and NCPRI conducted a host of consultations in each divisional headquarters of the State. Drawing on the input from these consultations, a draft civil society Right to Information Bill was prepared, which was then submitted to the Committee. The Committee drew on the citizens draft Bill for its recommendations, but refused to accept the Bill in toto. The Rajasthan Right to Information Act 2000 was eventually passed on 11 May 2000. The Act in its final form retained many of the suggestions of the RTI movement, but diluted others. In the early 2000s Anna Hazare led a movement in Maharashtra state which forced the state government to pass a stronger Maharashtra Right to Information Act. This Act was later considered as the base document for the Right to Information Act 2005 (RTI), enacted by the Union Government. It also ensured that the President of India assented to this new Act. Law professor Alasdair Scott Roberts said:

The state of Maharashtra – home to one of the world's largest cities, Mumbai, adopted a Right to Information Act in 2003, prodded by the hunger strike of prominent activist, Anna Hazare. ("All corruption can end only if there is freedom of information," said Hazare, who resumed his strike in February 2004 to push for better enforcement of the Act).

In 2004, under the leadership of Sonia Gandhi, the Congress party won the national elections and formed the central government. Aruna Roy was inducted into the National Advisory Committee (NAC), an extremely powerful but extra-constitutional quasi-governmental body headed by Sonia Gandhi which effectively supervises the working of the common minimum program of UPA II . Aruna Roy submitted a paper recommending amendments to the 2002 Freedom of Information Act to the NAC which in turn sent by it to the Prime Minister's Office. The Right to Information Bill 2004 (RTI Bill 2004) was tabled on 23 December during the winter session of the Lok Sabha. The RTI Bill 2004 was based largely on recommendations submitted to the Government by the NAC which was passed by the Indian parliament in 2005. On 20 July 2006 the Union Cabinet amended the Right to Information Act 2005 to exclude the file noting by the government officials from its purview. Hazare began his fast unto death on 9 August 2006 in Alandi against the proposed amendment. He ended his fast on 19 August 2006, after the government agreed to change its earlier decision.

Scope-

The Act covers the whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir, where J&K Right to Information Act is in force. It is applicable to all constitutional authorities, including the executive, legislature and judiciary; any institution or body established or constituted by an act of Parliament or a state legislature. It is also defined in the Act that bodies or authorities established or constituted by order or notification of appropriate government including bodies "owned, controlled or substantially financed" by government, or non-Government organizations "substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds" provided by the government are also covered in it.

Private bodies

Private bodies are not within the Act's ambit directly. In a landmark decision of 30-Nov-2006 ('Sarbajit Roy versus DERC') the Central Information Commission also reaffirmed that privatized public utility companies continue to be within the RTI Act- their privatization not withstanding.

Process-

Under the Act, all the authorities covered must appoint their Public Information Officer (PIO). Any person may submit a request to the PIO for information in writing. It is the PIO's obligation to provide information to citizens of India who request information under the Act. If the request pertains to another public authority (in whole or part), it is the PIO's responsibility to transfer/forward the concerned portions of the request to a PIO of the other within 5 working days. In addition, every public authority is required to designate Assistant Public Information Officers (APIOs) to receive RTI requests and appeals for forwarding to the PIOs of their public authority. The applicant is not required to disclose any information or reasons other than his name and contact particulars to seek the information. "Rtination"  are the online system which facilitates the filing of RTI (Right To Information Act, India) applications online. It aims primarily at minimizing the time taken and effort required in filing an application. The Act specifies time limits for replying to the request.

• If the request has been made to the PIO, the reply is to be given within 30 days of receipt.
• If the request has been made to an APIO, the reply is to be given within 35 days of receipt.
• If the PIO transfers the request to another public authority (better concerned with the information requested), the time allowed to reply is 30 days but computed from the day after it is received by the PIO of the transferred authority.
• Information concerning corruption and Human Rights violations by scheduled Security agencies (those listed in the Second Schedule to the Act) is to be provided within 45 days but with the prior approval of the Central Information Commission.
• However, if life or liberty of any person is involved, the PIO is expected to reply within 48 hours.

Since the information is to be paid for, the reply of the PIO is necessarily limited to either denying the request (in whole or part) and/or providing a computation of "further fees". The time between the reply of the PIO and the time taken to deposit the further fees for information is excluded from the time allowed. If information is not provided within this period, it is treated as deemed refusal. Refusal with or without reasons may be ground for appeal or complaint. Further, information not provided in the times prescribed is to b e provided free of charge. For Central Departments as of 2006, there is a fee of 10 for filing the request, 2 per page of information and 5 for each hour of inspection after the first hour. If the applicant is a Below Poverty Line Card holder(BPL), then no fee shall apply. Such BPL Card holders have to provide a copy of their BPL card along with their application to the Public Authority. States Government and High Courts fix their own rules.

Partial disclosure

The Act allows those part(s) of the record which are not exempt from disclosure and which can reasonably be severed from parts containing exempt information to be provided.

Exclusion-

Central Intelligence and Security agencies specified in the Second Schedule like IB, Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation, RAW, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of Enforcement, Narcotics Control Bureau, Aviation Research Centre, Special Frontier Force, BSF, CRPF, ITBP, CISF, NSG, Assam Rifles, Special Service Bureau, Special Branch (CID), Andaman and Nicobar, The Crime Branch-CID-CB, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Special Branch, Lakshadweep Police. Agencies specified by the State Governments through a Notification will also be excluded. The exclusion, however, is not absolute and these organizations have an obligation to provide information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations. Further, information relating to allegations of human rights violation could be given but only with the approval of the Central or State Information Commission.

Information Exclusions-

The following is exempt from disclosure [(S.8)]

• Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, "strategic, scientific or economic" interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offense;
• Information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court;
• Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the State Legislature;
• Information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
• Information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
• Information received in confidence from foreign Government;
• Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes;
• Information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders;
• Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers;
• Information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual (but it is also provided that the information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied by this exemption);
• Notwithstanding any of the exemptions listed above, a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests. (NB: This provision is qualified by the proviso to sub-section 11(1) of the Act which exempts disclosure of "trade or commercial secrets protected by law" under this clause when read along with 8(1)(d))

Articlessss

Nirwastra Hoti Dharohar-2

‘Public samaan dekhati hai dukaan nahin, aur jab sharafat ke kapde utarte hain toh sabse jyada majaa bhi sharifon ko hi aata hai.’ Yeh samwaad pichhale saal pradarshit hui film ‘The Dirty Picture’ se hai. Iski nirmata Ekta Kapoor ka kehna hai ki 50 scenes kaatne ke baad bhi pata nahin kyon ise T.V. channels par pradsarshit nahin kiya jaa rahe hai. Sonchane ki baat hai, yadi 50 scenes kaatne ke baad bhi film pradarshit hone layak nahin toh use pahle kya hoga? Is lekh ke pichhale ank mein humne sangit ke malin hone ki vyatha suni thi, is ank mein hum apni us dharohar ke nagn wa nirwastra hone ki vyatha katha sunenge jise 1913 mein aayi film Raja Harishchandra’ se lekar 1932 ki ‘Alam Ara’ aura b pichali release Maximum tak sabhi filmon ne apnaya hai, Title, Plot Aur Dialogues… Parde par Kamottej kai varshon se chala aa raha hai, uske liye Censor Board ne alag grade tay kar diya hai. Ek samay tha jab koi bhi pratisthit aur bada sitara aisi filmon mein kaam nahin karna chahta tha, us grade ko Bollywood ka sharm kaha jata tha. Parantu aaj badalte yug ke sath bade-bade sitaare bhi is tarah ki filmon mein hath aajmate hain. Aaj ke darshakon ko kya chahiye? Har shukrawar ko kuch nya. Kuch naye ke sath kuch accha. Kahte hain Bhartiya darshak bhi ab Hollywood darshkon ki tarah paripakwa ho gaye hain wa The Reader jaisi filmon ka intezaar kar rahe hain. Paripakwa dimaag va chahat hamaari sanskriti ko badal nahin sakti aur nahi hamaare rishton ke samajh ko. Taaza udaharan lete hain- humne apne ghar mein Saas-Bahu ko ya toh Maa-beti ki tarah dekha hai ya toh phir do dushmanon ki tarah. Fir ‘Vicky Donor’ mein donon ka sath baithkar sharab pita dekhna achambhit hi karta hai. Humaare filmon ke naam bhi ab Hollywood ke filmon ke titles ko takkar deti hai. Jahaan Hollywood mein ‘Sex & the city’ hai toh humaare yahan bhi ‘Kaminey, The Dirty Picture’ jaise naam chalet hain. ‘Jism’ toh thik tha, ‘Jism2’ bhi aa rahi hain. Kya hamari sanskriti itni majboor ho gayi hai ki videshi gand ko bhartiya mehmaan baji ada ki jaa rahi hai. Videshi mudde, videshi kalakaar aur videshi bewkoofiyan jise humour ka naam dekar bhartiya darshakon ko ek film parosa jaa raha hai aur hum uska khoob lutf utha rahen hain. Antarjaal se lekar Mobile Phone aur T.V. se lekar Cinema gharon tak. Kya Bandini banane wale Roy sahib ne socha hoga ki bharat mein kabhi ‘Ragini MMS’ naam ki bhi fim banegi aur ‘Love Story’ banana wale Jubilee Kumar ne socha hoga ki  ‘Hate Story’ bhi banegi.Mahilaon par atyachar aur unke utthan ki dastan koi naya plot nahin hai par iske liye ‘The Dirty Picture’ aur ‘ Diary of a Butterfly’ ki jarurat nahin. Pichle varsh ek film mein ‘Male Prostitution’ arthat ‘purush vaishya’ ka mudda utha tha, iske poorva ‘samalaingikta’ aur ‘pre-marital relationships’ par bhi dheron filmein ban chuki hai. Hamaari 100 varshon ki dharohar nirantar nirvastra hoti jaa rahi hai. Yeh ek satya hai ki Ramayan va Puranon par har film nahin banyi jaa sakti par banana ke lliye deshnmein kai mudde taktaki lagaye dekh rahe hain taaki ek baar toh unka bhi uddhar ho jaye. E baar toh koi rangmanch ka rukh kare kain mudde milenge. Desh ke pustakalayon mein jaakar Gurudev, Premchand aur Sharatchand ko dhundho toh Othelo, Merchant of Venice shariken kai kritiyaan milengi. Poori deshi aur apni sanskriti ki maryaadon ke sath….

Articlessss

Apnon ko Manana Hai, Zara Der Lagegi….

Vivashata Rajneeti ka mool hai. Ji haan, vivashta ko hum aam bol chal ki bhasha mein faisala na le pane ki dasha bol sakte hain. Rajneeti ke ankuran se lekar aaj uske ek majboot darakht banana tak vivashta iske bhitar ‘ xylem’ aur ‘phloem’ ka kaam kar rahi hai. Yadi Dhritrashtra va Bhisma ki vivashta na hoti toh Mahabharat ka yuddh na hota, Ravana ki vivashta na hoti toh Ram-Ravana yuddh na hota, Dashrath ki vivashta na hoti toh ram ko vanvaas na hota, Harishchandra ki vivashta use uska raj-kaj naa choorvati. Vivashta ne itihaas ke har panne par apni jagah bana kar rakhi hai. Kivdantiyon ki mane toh Bharat mein Angrezon ko panaah milna Mughalon ki vivashta thi toh Pakistaan ka alag hona Gandhi ji ki.                                                                                                                         

                                Yah prashna itna gambhir hai ki iska ilaaz swayam ishwar bhi nahin kar paaye the. Aaj ke paridrashya mein vivashta rajneeti ki pehchan ban gayi hai. Daur gathbandhan ka jo hai, sabke sath insaf karna bhi jaruri hai aur sabke naaz-nakhre uthana bhi. Jahaan rashtriya dale k-doosre se takrati thi vahin aaj kshetriya dal bhi rashtriya dal se takraane se nahin darti khaskar we jinki wahaan sarkaaren hai. 2008 mein yadi LEFT ki BENGAL wa Kerala mein sarkaar na hoti toh wo UPA ka katai hath nahin chhorti, vivasha ho kar America se haath Milana hi parta. Aaj ki baat Karen. Rashtrapati chunav ab jor pakar chuka hai. Donon pramukh dalon ne apne pratinidhi utar diye hain. Paksh ka pratinidhitwa BENGALI BABU PRANAV MUKHARJI kar rahen hain toh vipaksha ki ore se dhwaja lekar P.L. SANGAMA aage badh rahe hain. Is chunav ne dono hi partiyon ki taaqat ko kamjor kiya hai. Jahaan UPA ka pratinidhi usaki sahyogi TMC pramukh MAMATA didi ko raas nahi aaye wahin NDA ke pramukh ghatak JDU ka inhe poora samarthan hai. Donon hi gthbandhanon ke liye ye partiyaan bahut jaruri hai. TMC ne jahaan Paschim Banga mein 34 varshon ke Vaampanthi sarkaar ki jaren ukhaar kar phenk di wahin 2010 mein JDU ne bina Vipaksha ke sarkaar bana kar itihaas bana diya tha. Samay dheere-dheere karvat le raha hai. Mughal shaasan kaal mein bhi yadi Delhi par kaabiz Mughal samrajya ko yadi kshetriya shaskon ke sammilit chunauti ka samna karna parta toh who bhi hil sakta tha. Daman tabhi ho sakta hai jab tukre bichhad jaayen, Kahte hain- ‘Jhoond se nikle Langoor aur Gucche se nikle Angoor ki shamat tay hoti hai.’ Aaj sirf do hi kaam h sakte hain ya toh donon hi bari rashtriya partiyan apni gathbandhnon ko sangathit wa sashakta kare yaa phir haath mila kar ek doosre ko kshetriya dalon se milne waali chunauti ke liye taiyaar ho jaayen. Jahaan NCP ke anubhavi aur purane neta P.L. SANGAMA apni ummidwari kayam rakhne ke liye B.J.P. se ja mile. Harish Rawat Uttarakhand mein satta na milne se ahat ho apani hi sarkar girawane lage. Karnataka mein YEDURAPPA ki nautanki jagjahir he JDU ke sashakt mukhaymantri NITISH KUMAR wa BJP ke NARENDRA MODI ke beech ka dwandwa kisi se nahi chhipa. Sabhi rajneetik dalon ki apni paresaniyan hain aur sabse badi bandhu virodh ka darr. Apne hi agar rudh gaye to kya hoga apne ko manane mein hi aaj sarkar apna aadha waqt gawan deti he sabhi ko khush rakhane ke chakkar mein kaise Rajneetik dal janata ko khush rakhna bhool jaate hain. Apna dukhra sunane ko bhi toh koi nahin milta, yadi kisi sahyogi ko sunai toh kahin wo naraz na ho jaye. Gair toh naaraz hote hi hain, yahaan toh apne ho gye hain. Apnon ko manana hai zara der lagegi……

Articlesss

India Jaan le gayi

“Mori Imorted kamariya chant ke aayi duniya, Welcome Welcome karti India jaan le gayi” Film Shanghai ka ye Gaana bharat ke us sunhare kal ki yaad dilaata hai jab hum sone ki chiriya the.Bharat ek sone ki chiriya thi par aaj ye sirf ek chiriya reh gayi hai, aksar hum is samwaad se ru-ba-roo hote hain aur har baar main toh jhunjhala hi jati hoon. Wah vyakti jo Bharat ke bare mein aisa kehta hai yaa toh wo yahaan ka nahin hai ya bharat ko acche se nahin janta tabhi to who is Kiwadanti ko hanare desh ki sacchai bata raha hai. Kaun kehta hai ki Bharat ka khazana khali ho gaya hai. Yeh khazana itna vyapak hai ki kabhi khali nahi ho sakta kyonki Ye ek son eke ande dene wali murgi hai maar kar bhi ek baar mein loota nahin jaa sakta. Sonchiye jahaan ki patthar ki murtiyaan 2500-3000 core ke maalik hain toh chalte-phirte insaan kaise garib ho sakta. Jis desh mein Vyakti ke sapney uske kad se kain bade hain, car toh Ferrari, ghar to Haveli, Holyday toh Manila, aur na jane kya—us desh ka arth ka shnya kaise ho sakta hai. Koi bhi desh sirf Arth ke khazane se hi nahin chalta hai varan aur bhi kain prakar ke khazane bhi hote hain jo kisi desh ki pragati mein sahayak hote hain. Aur is mamale mein Bharat apne pratidwandiyon se kai aage hai, chalo is desh ke khazanon ke bare mein sonchte hain kya nikal ke aata hai, ek din ka CAG banati hoon. Sabse pehla aur sabse vyapak khazana- Manav Sansadhan(Human Resource); yahaan jansankhya ki koi kami nahi hai balki itni jyada hai ki yahaan ki zameen iske liye kam padti hai, tabhi toh duniya ke kisi bhi kone mein Dhoop, Hawa, Paani aur Bijli mile na mile Bhartiya jarur milenge. Dusra khazana- yahaan ke logon ki chahat aur sapney, khana mile na mile par pina hona chahiye, kapde phatey ho gham nahin par perfume ki mahak aani chahiye, log bhookhey marey par anaaz niryaat karke For-ex kamana hai, Software ke bare mein aadhi aabadi nahin janati hogi par duinya ka sabse bada Software niryatak desh bharat hai. Itni vyapak khazana kya koi loot sakta hai? Phir kyon log is desh ko sone ki chiriya kahen, nahin ab nahin is chiriya ko Suraksha ke liye kahin choopa diya hai shayad kisi Aitihasik mandir mein, ya phir Sarkari Babuon ke ghar mein, nahin RBI ko note chapney ke liye isi chiriya ke pankh dete hain. Kaun aise chiriya ko lootna chahege jo pehchana hi na jaa sakega, phir bhi Bharat sach mein khazanon ka desh hai. Har din kitne hi khazane loote jate hain kahin mandir toh kahin ghar ek mandir. India ko ab koi Third World Country na kahe, ise The Treasure Mainland kahen yahi iski pehchaan hai aur razaa bhi…… Isiliye kahte hain ki-

Sone ki Chiriya, Dengue Maleria,

Gur bhi hai- Gobar bhi

Bharat Mata ki Jai………

From the pen of my Sister-

Artclesss

..Main PARESHAAN, PARESHAAN..

As the race for the 13^th Indian resident is going moment changing, every Indian opening their orifices & dropping their jaws are gawking at their TV sets. In every next moment the ball swings to different candidates. It’s tough to even play the bet, almost impossible to judge the intents. Whom will SONIA ji squelch & push ahead as India’s new president. PRONOB da, HAMID saab  & ummm… ….. Only. The Under Performed Alliance chief Sonia ji is on the bank to lose INC’s reliance. In all this drama there are various personas who are harassed at their peak. If anyone who is most pareshaan during this all ongoing melodrama is ……, ….., ……. Any guesses, yes obviously it’s we, the people of India. I can presage here that whosoever may become our 13^th head of nation but we are not going to have Jocosity on T.V. till 20^th of July. It has been more than 15 days for the regular shows & bulletins on Indian News Channels. Till now I haven’t understood the mutiny for the President election. It’s something else for the general election, when the crippled system of India presents, promotes, prices & fights for the victory. General Election interacts with the common people; in the way who we are going to vote, who is going to lead World’s biggest democracy, who will represent in the assembly? But what the aid president is going to put on us, so we may go pareshan. Just we are not only harassed but also another person who is more PARESHAAN than us, is our ‘Iron Lady-2’, Mrs. Gandhi. The well clad MMS (Man Mohan Singh), All the overloaded cabinetaries & of course the chauffer of Congress’ Chariot; Baba, Rahul Baba all are doing some or the other thing to show IL2 that they are sharing her frustration. Whoever she puts ahead is either not picked or liked by its coalition partners. TMC chief MAMATA has almost rejected Pranab da, she has well accompanied by non-govt. supporters SP & BSP. They jointly have presented 3 new options for having the candidature to the race. Chief of National Advisory Council needs a good & healthy advice from someone, so she seeked to old Congress leaders. Now, she is facing the real storm, as any misunderstanding & negligence may lead UPA to a great loss in coming general election of 2014. Many spokesperson of several parties have hinted of Mid-term election. As on-whole denying it all poli-parties said it of no connection with the alliance. What so ever, but everyone knows UPA is in danger, whether NDA not on the seventh heaven but these Regional Parties playing the cards. Orissa, Tamilnadu govt. has whole heartedly supported P.L. Sangama; Bihar, Jharkhand, Punjab & Karnataka’s regional parties will follow NDA suit. So it’s ofcourse bit tough time for UPA chairperson Madam Sonia ji . she must be humming all the time recent chartbuster from ISHAQZAADE--- Main Pareshan, Pareshan, Pareshan….. to hide her frustration & remembering her partners…  

 

Articlesssss

---Rashtriya Ekikaran Ke ISHAQZAADE---

Abhi kuch hafton pahle ek film aayi thi- Habib Faizal ki ‘ISHAQZAADE’. Film ke antim drishya mein nayak apni nayika se kehta hai- “ Tere mere pyaar mein ek baat toh acchi hui, Quirashi aur Chauhan ki partnership, warna bandook taane hi milte the.” Yeh samwaad sunne mein accha laga tha, atah is par manthan bhi awashyak hai. Samwaad ko varnit kiya hai Habib Faizal ne atah iski gahraayi ko samjha jana chahiye. 100 Varshon ke cinema itihaas mein ‘prem’ lagbhag sabhi Bhartiya filmon ka mool raha hai. 1947 mein azaadi ke baad filmon ka aisa daur bhi aaya jab Deshbhakti filmon ka matlab Simaaon par jung ladna hi rah gaya tha ya phir Deshbhakti geeton se susajjit kisi Mahapurush ki Jeevani ya Sansmaran. Un Filmon mein Pakistaani Fauz ya British Raj ko khalnayak ke roop mein dikhaya jaata tha, isse hamare desh mein niwaas kar rahe wahaan ke sharanarthiyon ki bhawnao ko thes pahunchata tha. Jab desh ke log khush na ho wo Deshbhakti kaisi? Deshbhakti ka sirf ek mool hai Ekikaran, Rashtriya Ekikaran. ‘Bobby’ ko lijiye, Amiri-Garibi ka bhed mita diya, ‘Amar-Akbar-Anthony’ mein ek hi parivaar ke teen alag-alag Dharma ke bhai. Yadi kisi film ne sahi shuruaat ki to wo thi- Gadar: Ek Prem Katha. Sikh ladke aur Musalmaan ladki ki ek amar prem katha, jisne manawata wa rashtriya ekta ke sath-sath Vishwa shanty tak ka sandesh de diya. Rashtriya Ekikaran kisi rashtra ke ekta, akhandata tatha samprabhuta ke liye awashyak kyon hai? Koi rashtra kisi ek Insaan ya Dharma ka nahin hota, dharma toh sirf ek ikaai hai rashtranirmaan ke liye. Gandhi wa Kautilya dono ke hi rashtra nirmaan kea lag sapney aur nazariye the. Aaj ke is daur mein dono hi siddhanton  ki kami khalti hai. Koi kitni bhi manavata pradarshit kare parantu Bahya dharma ke naam par talwarein khinch thi aur rahengi. Agar Ishaqzaade in talwaaron ko rokna chahe to unhe ye apne jism par khani hogi. Dharma ke prachar se hi saari Manviya Vikaron wa Shatruta ka beej utpann hua jo ab Rakhtabeej ki bhanti har khoon ke katren ke sath badhta hi jaa raha hai. Sonchiye yadi sirf ek dharma hota toh sampurna vishwa ek samaaj hota, lekin aisa nahin hai. Hum bahut andar tak bante hue hain- dharma, Jaati, mool, linga, gotra, parivaar, khandaan, pahunch aur yahaan tak ki bhasha. Kaun jod sakta hai itne bikhre kisi samaaj ko. Kya koi? Ishaqzade toh nahi? Rajneetigya toh bilkul nahin. Arthat ye hamara rashtra kabhi ekikrit nahin hoga. Sadaa bikhra rahega. Hum parosi sadaiv ek desh ke, ek grah ke hone ke bawjood alag hi rahenge, kyonki hamaara dharma, rang, bhasha aur manyataein alag hain.

                                         Is desh ki har ikaai ko jorne ke baad ye desh banega, tab tak toh ye 120 crore ikaaiyon mein bataa Taapoo hai, jiske samooh ko India kahte hain. Is India ko jodne ke liye har dharma se Ishaqzaade chahiye taaki har dharma mein Partnership Badhti jaaye................